Trump Pardons Wyoming Diesel Mechanic in Diesel “Delete” Case

|
November 8, 2025
|
19 comments

President Donald Trump has granted a full and unconditional pardon to Wyoming diesel mechanic Troy Lake, who was convicted last year for tampering with vehicle emissions systems.

Lake, 65, had served seven months of a one-year federal prison sentence for modifying and removing emissions controls on diesel engines — a practice outlawed under federal clean act air laws.

He ran Elite Diesel Service near Cheyenne, was also fined $52,000. He was released to home confinement in September, wearing an ankle monitor. When news of his pardon came Friday, Lake said he was stunned and overcome with emotion.

“I don’t guess men are supposed to do that,” Lake told Cowboy State Daily, recalling how he broke down crying after hearing the message from U.S. Sen. Cynthia Lummis, who called to congratulate him. “It’s great. It’s news that, you know — I guess I look at it as, there are some good things that happen in the world.”

His wife, Holly Lake, pulled her car to the side of Interstate 25 and cried when she got the call. “These are the first tears I’ve shed over this whole thing since it all started,” she said, referring to six years of federal scrutiny following a 2018 raid on their shop by the Environmental Protection Agency.

The Lakes’ ordeal began after EPA agents accused Troy of performing “deletes” — removing or bypassing pollution-control systems in diesel trucks. Lake’s case became a symbol in Wyoming of what many locals and lawmakers see as government overreach in regulating small businesses.

Sen. Lummis championed Lake’s pardon request in Washington, calling his prosecution part of the “Biden administration’s weaponization against working Americans.” Though the EPA raid happened during Trump’s presidency, criminal charges were not filed until 2022. Lummis said Lake was punished “simply for keeping diesel engines in school buses, ambulances, and fire trucks running in our tough Western weather.”

Lummis personally urged Trump to pardon Lake and later introduced legislation to decriminalize the work of diesel mechanics who perform emissions modifications. “Calling to tell him tonight that he’d been pardoned by President Trump was a truly joyous moment,” she said in a statement.

Wyoming House Speaker Chip Neiman also praised the decision, thanking Trump for “doing the right thing” and standing up for victims of “government overreach.”

Lake said he now wants to use his experience to advocate for reform, urging regulators and the diesel industry to find practical, affordable ways to meet emissions goals without crippling small operators. “We need to sit down and think about a more logical way of doing it — not putting people out of work,” he said.

His friend and political consultant Jeff Daugherty, who worked pro bono to support the family’s case, said the pardon shows that “everyday people won today.”

For the Lakes, the ordeal that began with a federal raid in 2018 and ended with a presidential pardon in 2025 has been transformative. “We found out who our friends are,” Holly said. “It’s unbelievable.”

Leave the first comment

Loading new replies...

Avatar of testerdahl
testerdahl

Administrator

2,716 messages 4,601 likes

President Donald Trump has granted a full and unconditional pardon to Wyoming diesel mechanic Troy Lake, who was convicted last year for tampering with vehicle emissions systems. Lake, 65, had served seven months of a one-year federal prison sentence for modifying and removing emissions controls on diesel engines — a practice outlawed under federal clean act air laws. He ran Elite Diesel Service near Cheyenne, was also fined $52,000. He was released to home confinement in September, wearing an ankle monitor. When news of his pardon came Friday, Lake said he was stunned and overcome with emotion. “I don’t guess […] (read full article...)

Reply 1 like

T
The Car Guy

New member

8 messages 7 likes

Given that our country is willing to put some old guy in prison instead of actual murderers, this story makes me shake my head in many ways. Maybe, just maybe, there are bigger fish to fry than some people keeping diesels running by removing equipment that actually made them less reliable. Take the most basic example of EGR and direct injection, the two do not play nicely.

I think rolling coal is ignorant/unnecessary, and I think it's advantageous to have vehicles be efficient for power and having a cleaner burn, I enjoy smelling clean air (catalytic converters are nice in heavy traffic), but this guy shouldn't have been in federal prison, it's ridiculous.

Meanwhile, actual murderers are let loose from prisons, murder again...and everyone seems shocked. The justice system needs a recalibration, focus on the truly bad people in society, not some trivial emissions violations. There's my two cents Tim, how do you feel about it?

Reply Like

click to expand...
S
Saddle Tramp

Moderator

1,061 messages 1,198 likes

As I commented in the shorts, "Political posturing. Pure and simple."

*I want to clarify that I see both sides of the aisle doing this for political profit.

Reply 1 like

Avatar of Hilux
Hilux

Well-known member

425 messages 731 likes

Good, it was ridiculous to even put him in prison.

Reply Like

Avatar of testerdahl
testerdahl

Administrator

2,716 messages 4,601 likes

The justice system needs a recalibration, focus on the truly bad people in society, not some trivial emissions violations. There's my two cents Tim, how do you feel about it?

My thing is this case took 6 years to go through the court system, so I'm not sure how efficient our legal system is and I think that's the real issue - the efficiency. It takes years to put someone in prison and the same to get them out. Definitely a concern and that's why murders are on the streets. It isn't because I believe our police force isn't doing their jobs, it is the efficiency of the process.

For this crime, it isn't a simple breaking and entering like crime no doubt. It is a Federal crime though. So, where do you draw the line?

I decided to ask AI for a list of all the silly Federal crimes. Here they are:

  • Impersonating a government official: It is a federal crime to impersonate a postal worker or other federal agent.
  • Damaging federal property: This includes damaging a U.S. mailbox, a federal building, or even marking, defacing, or destroying U.S. currency.
  • National park and wildlife regulations: Federal laws prohibit many specific actions in national parks and forests, such as:
    • Carrying a metal detector
    • Flying a drone
    • Having an empty tent on the first night of camping
    • Harassing golfers
    • Making "unreasonable" noises with a pet
  • Food and labeling violations: It can be a federal crime to mislabel food, such as printing the words "turkey ham" with different fonts for "turkey" and "ham".
  • Handling of resources:
    • It is a federal crime to handle a fish under suspicious circumstances, a law sometimes called the Salmon Act.
    • It is also a federal crime to let a pig enter a public area where it might destroy grass.
  • Other odd laws:
    • Mailing a threatening letter to a circus
    • Importing a pregnant polar bear
    • Using a falconry bird in a movie that is not about falconry
    • Writing a check for less than one dollar

I mean there are plenty of silly Federal crimes. However, what is silly to you might be serious to others.

You say it was a trivial emissions issue. What if it is isn't to someone else? For example, my son has asthma. If he spends time around deleted diesel trucks in a confined space like a garage, he will have trouble breathing which could lead to serious health problems. Now if we have a lot of deleted diesels roaming around the PM in the air goes back to where it was in the 1980s and 199s, (Google a 1990s major city where the demand for emissions equipment started) my son won't be able to go outside on certain days due to the air quality. He would be forced to chose areas to live based on the air quality. Might even have to carry an oxygen tank. Is that fair to him?

Personally, I'm very much split on this issue. On the one hand, Troy was trying to save small businesses which is something I'm very much for. On the other hand, I think of the well being of my son. These aren't black and white issues.

The facts are the 2027 regulations are mandating automakers make the diesel emissions equipment more difficult to delete. While Troy means well, personally, I see this topic becoming a non-topic in decades to come. Diesel engines will either survive because the emissions equipment is more reliable or they will go away completely because people will stop buying them because you won't be able to use them without emissions equipment.

Reply 1 like

click to expand...
S
Saddle Tramp

Moderator

1,061 messages 1,198 likes

Six years to trial is insane. That is not enforcing the right to a speedy trial.

Reply Like

Avatar of Fightnfire
Fightnfire

Moderator

1,253 messages 2,150 likes

This isn't about police officers not doing they're job Tim. This is about prosecutors not bringing charges and judges letting people off. Or, in the reverse, prosecutors bringing silly charges wasting our money and complicit judges.

Reply Like

Avatar of testerdahl
testerdahl

Administrator

2,716 messages 4,601 likes

Six years to trial is insane. That is not enforcing the right to a speedy trial.

That’s about average imo.

Reply 1 like

Avatar of testerdahl
testerdahl

Administrator

2,716 messages 4,601 likes

This isn't about police officers not doing their job Tim. This is about prosecutors not bringing charges and judges letting people off. Or, in the reverse, prosecutors bringing silly charges wasting our money and complicit judges.

I thought that was the point I was making. Nothing to do with the police, the legal system is way too slow and inefficient.

Reply 1 like

Avatar of Fightnfire
Fightnfire

Moderator

1,253 messages 2,150 likes

I thought that was the point I was making. Nothing to do with the police, the legal system is way too slow and inefficient.

You're right, I was trying to agree and reiterate and it came across as argumentative.

I was trying to reiterate that it's not about the police officers but I also don't think it's about the process being inefficient, which it very much is, but in these cases it's about prosecutors and judges.

Murderers in our cities get off because of on the books prosecutors and complicit judges. People like Troy and heavy d get fined ridiculously, or thrown in prison, for the same reason from the opposite side.

One side gets let go because it serves a political purpose, the other side gets the book thrown at them because it also serves a political purpose.

Reply 2 likes

click to expand...
T
The Car Guy

New member

8 messages 7 likes

Tim, I’m not sure how police got dragged into this, they have nothing to do with it. My soon to be son in law is a cop, and I’m 100% supportive of law enforcement. They’re not the problem here, it’s the courts and judges.

I'm talking about judges and the most recent obvious stories where known criminals and murders get to walk free from jail, while old guys that deleted diesels go to federal prison. It's backwards.

Efficiency is one thing, but that isn't even the biggest issue, it's political motivation to let folks out that should not be let out. It feels like there’s selective enforcement and misplaced priorities, the system seems faster to release dangerous offenders than to show leniency in cases like this.

My son has asthma too but I never worry about deleted diesels even though we have some around here. I'll be sure not to trap him in a garage with one 🙂. Sports were much harder on him than deleted cars.

It’s odd, plenty of performance shops help people run gas cars without cats, yet diesel deletes get all the attention. I don’t think either should land someone in federal prison, but the focus seems really one-sided.

Also from AI... "There are significantly more gas cars in the U.S. than diesel trucks, with approximately 265.7 million gasoline/flex vehicles in operation compared to around 9.9 million diesel models in late 2023". So I don't think some deleted diesels are going to send air quality back to the 1980s.

So again...why is everyone so obsessed with Diesels? It's like people that don't like guns, they go after AR-15s so they are the boogie man, one of the smallest subset of guns that kill people.

I don’t think deleting emissions should be a federal crime. State fines and civil penalties are enough. Federal prison for a small number of cases like this is just a waste of taxpayer money. The majority of diesels aren't deleted, the majority of gas vehicles aren't deleted...we don't need federal prison for the small numbers that do. Fines and civil penalties are enough.

Do you think he should have gone to jail for this? You say you are split...but I want to hear a yes or no on this question.

Also, do you care that there are plenty of gas vehicles without cats and essentially "deleted" systems. Are you worried about those?

Maybe you are and I just haven't seen those articles and videos...

Reply 1 like

click to expand...

Signup for our weekly newsletter

Sign Up for Our Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletters to get the latest in car news and have editor curated stories sent directly to your inbox.