2026 Ram 1500 Black Express Towing Review: How the Standard-Output Hurricane Handles a 5,200-Pound Camper

|
January 7, 2026
|
8 comments
2026 Ram 1500 Black Express Towing 1

Just how well does the 2026 Ram 1500 Black Express towing performance meet expectations? I put this value-focused full-size pickup to the test where it matters most and hooked it up to my 30-foot dual-axle camper. This is a similar camper, same route, same hills I have used to evaluate Hemi V8s, diesels, and high-output turbo engines in the past. The goal was simple: determine whether this more affordable Ram 1500 still delivers a confident, modern towing experience.

Truck Setup and Towing Hardware

2026 Ram 1500 Black Express Towing 2
The 2026 Ram 1500 Black Express hooked up with a 30′ Coleman camper. (Photo by Tim Esterdahl)

This test truck is a 2026 Ram 1500 Black Express Crew Cab with the standard-output Hurricane engine, 420 horsepower and 469 lb-ft of torque, and an eight-speed automatic transmission. It rides on Ram’s five-link coil rear suspension rather than traditional leaf springs, which plays a noticeable role in ride quality and hitch setup. The camper weighs roughly 5,300 pounds dry and about 7,000 pounds loaded, with a measured tongue weight closer to 700 pounds—around 12 percent of trailer weight.

A few more stats: Payload was 1,694. Maximum towing with this truck is 8,390 and the fuel tank size is 26 gallons.

For this test, I swapped my longtime Reese hitch for a new Weigh Safe True Tow weight-distributing hitch. The built-in tongue weight scale immediately proved valuable, offering clarity on payload impact and proper distribution. Initial setup took time, about three hours, was typical for a first installation for such a complex hitch for me especially when dialing in ride height and clearance on the coil-sprung truck.

Once setup, it was nice to see the actual tongue weight and it performed well on the towing loop.

2026 Ram 1500 Black Express Towing Performance on the Road

2026 Ram 1500 Black Express Towing 3
The new Weigh Safe True Tow weight distributing hitch got the truck and camper pretty level. (Photo by Tim Esterdahl)

With Tow/Haul mode engaged, the Hurricane inline-six delivered smooth, consistent power. At highway speeds around 65 mph, the truck settled into a relaxed cruising rhythm at roughly 2,100 RPMs. The eight-speed transmission deserves credit here, holding gears intelligently and avoiding unnecessary hunting even with a 3.21 rear axle ratio. Even when rolling back into the throttle from lower speeds, acceleration felt controlled and confident.

Climbing the Wildcat Hills near Gering, Nebraska, a pretty good climb for my area, the Ram downshifted predictably and maintained speed without drama. The climb is about a mile and a half up 4-5% grade at 70 MPH. It is the sort of climb you will find semi trucks with their flashers on as they are forced to slow down to pull their loads up to the top.

While it cannot match the brute force of the high-output Hurricane in my Ram 1500 RHO, the standard-output version still outperformed the outgoing Hemi V8 in overall towing composure. I’ve tested both the Ram 1500 RHO and the Hemi V8 on this test with a camper.

Ride, Stability, and Driver Confidence

2026 Ram 1500 Black Express Towing 4
On the way down the Wildcat hills, the truck was handled the load just fine. (Screenshot by Tim Esterdahl)

Towing stability was a strong point going up and coming back down. Trailer sway control, integrated blind-spot monitoring for trailers, and well-tuned suspension geometry contributed to a calm, planted feel. Despite visible rear squat before final hitch adjustments, the truck tracked straight and felt predictable through curves and elevation changes.

The coil-spring rear suspension delivers a more comfortable ride than leaf springs, though it requires more attention during hitch setup to ensure proper load distribution. Once dialed in, the Ram felt secure both uphill and downhill, with engine braking and transmission logic working effectively on descents.

Fuel Economy Under Load

2026 Ram 1500 Black Express Towing 5
The new Hurricane standard output inline 6 engine returned 8.6 MPG for the heavy load. (Photo by Tim Esterdahl)

Fuel economy was initially disappointing, showing around 7.3 mpg at the midpoint of the test. However, over the full 50.5-mile loop, the average improved to 8.6 mpg. A follow-up fill-up confirmed the trip computer was off by just 0.7 mpg—well within acceptable margins.

Notably, this performance came on regular fuel, unlike the high-output Hurricane, which recommends premium for best performance. While it did not surpass the RHO’s best towing numbers of 9.4 to 10 MPG on a long-distance trip I took, the cost savings at the pump help balance the equation for buyers focused on long-term operating expenses.

Pricing and Final Verdict

2026 Ram 1500 Black Express Towing 6
The 2026 Ram 1500 Black Express is a base truck with a few extras. (Photo by Automotive Media Solutions)

The 2026 Ram 1500 Black Express tested here carries a sticker price of $51,130, including the Hurricane engine, Black Express appearance package and bed utility group. In base form, the Express trim starts around $43,775, making it one of the cheaper full-size trucks on the market. Four-wheel drive adds roughly $3,000, pushing a comparable configuration into the mid-$50,000 range.

From a towing perspective, this truck delivers far more capability than its price-first positioning suggests. It tows better than the Hemi, rides comfortably, and benefits from modern turbocharged efficiency and transmission tuning. If you are shopping for a no-nonsense Ram 1500 that can confidently handle campers, boats, or utility trailers without stepping up to premium trims or engines, the 2026 Ram 1500 Black Express with the standard-output Hurricane is a solid, well-rounded choice.

Leave the first comment

Loading new replies...

Avatar of testerdahl
testerdahl

Administrator

2,716 messages 4,601 likes

Just how well does the 2026 Ram 1500 Black Express towing performance meet expectations? I put this value-focused full-size pickup to the test where it matters most and hooked it up to my 30-foot dual-axle camper. This is a similar camper, same route, same hills I have used to evaluate Hemi V8s, diesels, and high-output turbo engines in the past. The goal was simple: determine whether this more affordable Ram 1500 still delivers a confident, modern towing experience. Truck Setup and Towing Hardware This test truck is a 2026 Ram 1500 Black Express Crew Cab with the standard-output Hurricane engine, […] (read full article...)

Reply 1 like

Avatar of Fightnfire
Fightnfire

Moderator

1,253 messages 2,150 likes

Tim, a couple of follow up question about this article, specifically this paragraph.

"Fuel economy was initially disappointing, showing around 7.3 mpg at the midpoint of the test. However, over the full 50.5-mile loop, the average improved to 8.6 mpg. A follow-up fill-up confirmed the trip computer was off by just 0.7 mpg—well within acceptable margins."

Does the .7 off mean the actual round trip MPG was 7.9 or 9.3? Or, is 8.6 the hand calculated number? Also, what is the size of the fuel tank on this truck? What is the payload and towing capacity of this truck?

Looking at the MPG, If 7.9, I would still call that pretty disappointing with a 5200lb camper. On my annual 400 mile round trip camping I average about 10-10.5 on the way there and 9.8-10.2 on the way back... different wind. That's towing a 29' trailer that dry is 6,800 and when loaded for the trip about 7,500. My father in laws 2023 RAM with the hemi is about the same as mine. He makes the same trip with us. I have the 6.2 he has the HEMI. Similar elevation gains as in the article.

Reply 1 like

click to expand...
Avatar of TheDo114
TheDo114

Well-known member

762 messages 1,203 likes

Tim, a couple of follow up question about this article, specifically this paragraph.

"Fuel economy was initially disappointing, showing around 7.3 mpg at the midpoint of the test. However, over the full 50.5-mile loop, the average improved to 8.6 mpg. A follow-up fill-up confirmed the trip computer was off by just 0.7 mpg—well within acceptable margins."

Does the .7 off mean the actual round trip MPG was 7.9 or 9.3? Or, is 8.6 the hand calculated number? Also, what is the size of the fuel tank on this truck? What is the payload and towing capacity of this truck?

Looking at the MPG, If 7.9, I would still call that pretty disappointing with a 5200lb camper. On my annual 400 mile round trip camping I average about 10-10.5 on the way there and 9.8-10.2 on the way back... different wind. That's towing a 29' trailer that dry is 6,800 and when loaded for the trip about 7,500. My father in laws 2023 RAM with the hemi is about the same as mine. He makes the same trip with us. I have the 6.2 he has the HEMI. Similar elevation gains as in the article.

I'd agree that 7-8 mpg would be pretty disappointing for a 5200lbs camper. I was expecting something much closer to 10mpg>

Fuel tank is either a 26 gallon tank or a 33 gallon tank. That means around 210-270 miles of range if you run the tank dry.

I'm curious what the other half ton would get on this loop. @testerdahl, are there any plans to put other trucks on your loop? I feel it's a much better test than the IKE Gauntlet since it's closer to real life than straight up a mountain for 8 minutes.

Reply Like

click to expand...
Avatar of testerdahl
testerdahl

Administrator

2,716 messages 4,601 likes

Tim, a couple of follow up question about this article, specifically this paragraph.

"Fuel economy was initially disappointing, showing around 7.3 mpg at the midpoint of the test. However, over the full 50.5-mile loop, the average improved to 8.6 mpg. A follow-up fill-up confirmed the trip computer was off by just 0.7 mpg—well within acceptable margins."

Does the .7 off mean the actual round trip MPG was 7.9 or 9.3? Or, is 8.6 the hand calculated number? Also, what is the size of the fuel tank on this truck? What is the payload and towing capacity of this truck?

Looking at the MPG, If 7.9, I would still call that pretty disappointing with a 5200lb camper. On my annual 400 mile round trip camping I average about 10-10.5 on the way there and 9.8-10.2 on the way back... different wind. That's towing a 29' trailer that dry is 6,800 and when loaded for the trip about 7,500. My father in laws 2023 RAM with the hemi is about the same as mine. He makes the same trip with us. I have the 6.2 he has the HEMI. Similar elevation gains as in the article.

Payload is 1,694. Maximum towing is 8,390. It had a 26 gallon tank.

Hand calculated was lower. This statement was from a 100-mile loop video I did the day before. I did that trip, filmed it and then inserted the snippet about how accurate the computer was into this towing video.

Reply 1 like

click to expand...
Avatar of testerdahl
testerdahl

Administrator

2,716 messages 4,601 likes

I'd agree that 7-8 mpg would be pretty disappointing for a 5200lbs camper. I was expecting something much closer to 10mpg>

Fuel tank is either a 26 gallon tank or a 33 gallon tank. That means around 210-270 miles of range if you run the tank dry.

I'm curious what the other half ton would get on this loop. @testerdahl, are there any plans to put other trucks on your loop? I feel it's a much better test than the IKE Gauntlet since it's closer to real life than straight up a mountain for 8 minutes.

I did this same test loop back in 2023 with four different trucks and a similar camper. I had a V8, hybrid, duramax diesel and a turbocharged engine.

Part of my goal in buying the camper last year was to do this very test with a variety of trucks and SUVs. I also want to get better at doing videos on these towing tests. And, with the website traffic seeing a big uptick lately, I want to publish more of these tests here as well.

I also agree it is more real-world than the Ike. I just need a catchy name for it.

The "Husker Towing Test!" LOL

Reply 1 like

click to expand...
Avatar of Fightnfire
Fightnfire

Moderator

1,253 messages 2,150 likes

Payload is 1,694. Maximum towing is 8,390. It had a 26 gallon tank.

Hand calculated was lower. This statement was from a 100-mile loop video I did the day before. I did that trip, filmed it and then inserted the snippet about how accurate the computer was into this towing video.

Thanks for the clarifying the numbers. .7 off (7.9 actual) at only 8.6mpg is 8.9% . So, if a truck was showing 20mpg on the computer it would actually be getting 18.22 hand calculated. That seems pretty far off to me. 7.9 also seems pretty bad.

Realistic range of low to mid 180 miles.

Just seems weird to me that the base engine is that bad with only 5,200lbs behind it.

Reply 1 like

click to expand...
Avatar of testerdahl
testerdahl

Administrator

2,716 messages 4,601 likes

Thanks for the clarifying the numbers. .7 off (7.9 actual) at only 8.6mpg is 8.9% . So, if a truck was showing 20mpg on the computer it would actually be getting 18.22 hand calculated. That seems pretty far off to me. 7.9 also seems pretty bad.

Realistic range of low to mid 180 miles.

Just seems weird to me that the base engine is that bad with only 5,200lbs behind it.

That's a really good point on taking the math and putting into perspective with a higher number.

Reply 1 like

Avatar of TheDo114
TheDo114

Well-known member

762 messages 1,203 likes

I did this same test loop back in 2023 with four different trucks and a similar camper. I had a V8, hybrid, duramax diesel and a turbocharged engine.

Part of my goal in buying the camper last year was to do this very test with a variety of trucks and SUVs. I also want to get better at doing videos on these towing tests. And, with the website traffic seeing a big uptick lately, I want to publish more of these tests here as well.

I also agree it is more real-world than the Ike. I just need a catchy name for it.

The "Husker Towing Test!" LOL

I loved that video and it played a role in my decision to purchase my tundra. I would love for you to run the trucks again and with all of the different engines.

Reply Like

click to expand...
Avatar of testerdahl
testerdahl

Administrator

2,716 messages 4,601 likes

I loved that video and it played a role in my decision to purchase my tundra. I would love for you to run the trucks again and with all of the different engines.

I don't. That was a hell of a lot of work. LOL. It was just a stroke of luck with the timing of everything. I don't believe I've ever gotten that lucky to get 4 full-size trucks in a row with my press schedule rotation.

Reply 1 like

Signup for our weekly newsletter

Sign Up for Our Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletters to get the latest in car news and have editor curated stories sent directly to your inbox.