Is there a Chevy Silverado stop sale? Yes. Here’s the deets

|
April 30, 2025
|
11 comments
2024 chevrolet silverado zr2 051

This week, General Motors issued a recall for 597,630 U.S. vehicles equipped with the 6.2-liter V-8 gasoline engine, this includes the Cadillac Escalade, Chevy Silverado, Tahoe and Suburban, GMC Sierra and Yukon that are equipped with this engine. It includes 2021 to 2024 models, so GM has told dealers not to sell any remaining SUVs and trucks that have this engine. Thus, there is, in fact, a 2024 Chevy Silverado stop sale. This does not include any 2025 models.

What’s the issue with the engine?

Essentially, the connecting rod and crankshaft engine components may have manufacturing defects that can lead to engine damage and engine failure.

According the “Part 573 Safety Recall Report” on the NHTSA.gov website, GM opened an investigation into the engine failures in vehicles equipped with the L87 V8 engine after having closed three prior investigations into this issue.

The investigation revealed that during a build period from March 1, 2021, to May 31, 2024, there was an increased rate of engine failure claims. The quality issues identified include:

  • Rod-bearing damage from sediment on connecting rods and crankshaft-oil galleries.
  • Out-of-specification crankshaft dimensions and surface finish.

The report states: “These issues can cause or contribute to bearing damage that can lead to loss of propulsion and engine failure.”

GM identified 28,102 complaints and stated there are 12 potentially related “alleged” crashes and injuries related to this issue.

Chevy Silverado stop sale details

According to Kelly Blue Book, GM ordered dealers not to sell any remaining 2024 Escalade, Silverado, Tahoe, Suburban, Sierra and Yukon models until they can be checked and repaired.

The outlet quotes a GM spokesperson, who said: “The safety and satisfaction of our customers are the highest priorities for the entire GM team, and we’re working to address this matter as quickly as possible.”

What’s the fix?

In the recall report, GM states that dealers will inspect vehicles with this engine and either repair the connecting rods and crankshafts or replace the entire engine if necessary.

If a vehicle passes inspection (aka doesn’t need repairs), it will be provided a higher viscosity oil, which will also require a new oil fill cap, oil filter replacement and an owner’s manual insert.

GM is also reportedly offering a 10-year, 150,000 mile warranty for engines that pass inspection.

Recall details copied from NHTSA.gov

General Motors LLC (GM) is recalling certain 2021-2024 Cadillac Escalade and Escalade ESV, Chevrolet Silverado 1500, Suburban, and Tahoe, GMC Sierra 1500, Yukon, and Yukon XL vehicles equipped with a 6.2L V-8 gas engine. The connecting rod and/or crankshaft engine components may have manufacturing defects that can lead to engine damage and engine failure.

Dealers will inspect the engine, and as necessary, repair or replace the engine. For vehicles that pass inspection, dealers will add higher viscosity oil, install a new oil fill cap, replace the oil filter, and update the owner’s manual. Repairs will be performed free of charge. Owner notification letters are expected to be mailed June 9, 2025. Owners may contact Cadillac customer service at 1-800-333-4223, Chevrolet customer service at 1-800-222-1020, or GMC customer service at 1-800-462-8782. GM’s number for this recall is N252494000.

NHTSA Campaign Number: 25V274000
Manufacturer General Motors, LLC
Components ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING
Potential Number of Units Affected 597,630

Our take on the Chevy Silverado stop sale, recall

Recalls happen, and we’re glad this one is finally happening since it looks like the issue has been investigated since 2022. While recalls are annoying – as are stop sales when you’re looking to buy a truck now – the end goal is to keep you, and everyone else on the road safe. While getting this issue repaired takes time out of your day, remember: The fix is free.

To verify if your truck is affected, go over to the NHTSA.gov recalls page and type in the specific VIN for your truck.

Leave the first comment

Loading new replies...

Avatar of testerdahl
testerdahl

Administrator

2,716 messages 4,601 likes

This week, General Motors issued a recall for 597,630 U.S. vehicles equipped with the 6.2-liter V-8 gasoline engine, this includes the Cadillac Escalade, Chevy Silverado, Tahoe and Suburban, GMC Sierra and Yukon that are equipped with this engine. It includes 2021 to 2024 models, so GM has told dealers not to sell any remaining SUVs […] (read full article...)

Reply 4 likes

Avatar of chaseydog
chaseydog

Well-known member

322 messages 547 likes

I'm seeing more and more 6.2L owners on reddit and various forums asking if they should trade in thier 6.2's. I wonder how the Stop Sale affects the dealers ability or willingness to take a 6.2 as a trade in. Does the Stop Sale mean they can't do it? Does it mean that they have less incentive to take a trade in, or that the value of the trade in is diminished?

Reply Like

Avatar of Hilux
Hilux

Well-known member

425 messages 731 likes

Can we be honest here? wouldn't it have been better for GM to have taken care of this on the 59th engine that self destructed instead of waiting until it was 597,630? don't these warranty departments have any contact with the engineering departments? don't these companies have any sense of urgency? don't these companies have any sense of shame for shafting their customers?
This is BS ridiculous.

Reply 3 likes

Avatar of chaseydog
chaseydog

Well-known member

322 messages 547 likes

Can we be honest here? wouldn't it have been better for GM to have taken care of this on the 59th engine that self destructed instead of waiting until it was 597,630? don't these warranty departments have any contact with the engineering departments? don't these companies have any sense of urgency? don't these companies have any sense of shame for shafting there customers?
This is BS ridiculous.

If there hadn't been an NHTSA investigation would GM have done the recall or would they still be dealing with it as isolated events?

Reply 4 likes

Avatar of Fightnfire
Fightnfire

Moderator

1,253 messages 2,150 likes

Can we be honest here? wouldn't it have been better for GM to have taken care of this on the 59th engine that self destructed instead of waiting until it was 597,630? don't these warranty departments have any contact with the engineering departments? don't these companies have any sense of urgency? don't these companies have any sense of shame for shafting their customers?
This is BS ridiculous.

I don't disagree with you.

My hunch would tell me they knew about the problem and like most manfucaturers hoped it was minor and that factory warranties would take care of the issue for anyone experiencing it. I also believe they knew exactly how many of these issues existed and possibly exist if it's a part problem. If it's a manufacturing/assembly problem that can be a little trickier.

However, after enough complaints the NHTSA gets involved and finds it's a safety issue. Similar to the Tundra recall, so like Toyota their hand becomes forced yet they still get to claim "They are voluntarily initiating the recall."

This behavior by GM, Ford and Toyota are why consumers have lost trust and are pissed off.

Trust is very hard to build and very easy to lose.

What has this done for me? Well, I've lost trust. So, therefor, I don't really believe the engineers when Tim interviews them. It's good information but I take it with a grain of salt. I don't beleive the reasons we're told why things are the way they are. RAM wants to sell as many trucks as possible and I believe ALL of their messaging is controlled to try and make that happen. I'm sure a lot of what they are saying is true, but some of it is skewed or straight up bullshit.

Reply 3 likes

click to expand...
Avatar of Fightnfire
Fightnfire

Moderator

1,253 messages 2,150 likes

@testerdahl

What do you think about Toyota and now GM ...with plenty of others before. Ignoring obvious consumer complaints and serious issues until the NHTSA, and lawsuits, steps in and forces the manufacturer's hand with a safety issue?

This recall doesn't even touch the lifter issues GM trucks are having and Rams went completely ignored for a dozen years. The list goes on and on.

Reply 1 like

Avatar of TheDo114
TheDo114

Well-known member

762 messages 1,203 likes

@testerdahl

What do you think about Toyota and now GM ...with plenty of others before. Ignoring obvious consumer complaints and serious issues until the NHTSA, and lawsuits, steps in and forces the manufacturer's hand with a safety issue?

This recall doesn't even touch the lifter issues GM trucks are having and Rams went completely ignored for a dozen years. The list goes on and on.

I think GM is and was trying to sweep everything under the rug. The fact that they sold more than half a million engines before issuing a recall is insane. And like you said, that does not cover all of their other engines experiencing issues. It's a sad affair all around and for once, I'm happy that the internet exist to call them out on their bullshit.

Reply Like

click to expand...
Avatar of testerdahl
testerdahl

Administrator

2,716 messages 4,601 likes

@testerdahl

What do you think about Toyota and now GM ...with plenty of others before. Ignoring obvious consumer complaints and serious issues until the NHTSA, and lawsuits, steps in and forces the manufacturer's hand with a safety issue?

This recall doesn't even touch the lifter issues GM trucks are having and Rams went completely ignored for a dozen years. The list goes on and on.

Two things. First, it is hard to not give GM shit for not finding this issue. The video I did today I put they missed it 3 times in the title. THREE TIMES! WTF.

Second, I’ve asked a few viewers about the lifters. There’s a feeling the lifters are tied to this recall. I can’t find evidence of that. It is interesting to me people are leaping to that conclusion. Thoughts?

Missed It 3 Times?! GM's 6.2L V8 Engine Recall Field Report Wows

Reply 1 like

click to expand...
Avatar of testerdahl
testerdahl

Administrator

2,716 messages 4,601 likes

And yes, I completely agree with you @Fightnfire. It shouldn’t take the Feds getting involved to find the issues and do the right thing. That’s some grade A BS.

Now, as I’ve said, many times the Feds do get involved and it turns into nothing. For example, there was a case of Ford manipulating their EcoBoost MPG numbers I was sure the Feds would put the hammer down on Ford over. I think my thumbnail was owner’s will get a refund. Turned out to be nothing.

So I have to be a bit careful taking every recall that the Feds get into to attacking automakers. I’ve been wrong before and had egg on my face.

Reply 2 likes

click to expand...
Avatar of Fightnfire
Fightnfire

Moderator

1,253 messages 2,150 likes

Two things. First, it is hard to not give GM shit for not finding this issue. The video I did today I put they missed it 3 times in the title. THREE TIMES! WTF.

Second, I’ve asked a few viewers about the lifters. There’s a feeling the lifters are tied to this recall. I can’t find evidence of that. It is interesting to me people are leaping to that conclusion. Thoughts?

Missed It 3 Times?! GM's 6.2L V8 Engine Recall Field Report Wows

My uneducated opinion is that the lifters are directly tied to the fact that they are collapsible to allow for AFM, DFM and whatever RAM calls it.

They took what for decades was a solid component and turned it into a two-piece collapsible lifter entirely dependent upon oil pressure and extremely precise timing.

I think if you gave an engineer truth serum they would tell you that there is a higher fail rate with a collapsible lifter than a solid lifter and they have deemed it an acceptable cost of doing business to meet demands for better efficiency.

They hope that the majority will go bad before factory warranty or if not they will be covered under extended warranties.

Pay the cost of fines or not meeting EPA and or developing new engines or pay for some lifter repairs, I think they chose that route.

Which reminds me by the way I would like to see some data on how many consumers nowadays are buying extended warranties out of the gate compared to 5, 10, 15 and 20 years ago. That business seems like it's booming and it's consumers putting their money with their mouth is... Because of lack of trust and faith.

Reply 1 like

click to expand...
Avatar of chaseydog
chaseydog

Well-known member

322 messages 547 likes

Two things. First, it is hard to not give GM shit for not finding this issue. The video I did today I put they missed it 3 times in the title. THREE TIMES! WTF.

Second, I’ve asked a few viewers about the lifters. There’s a feeling the lifters are tied to this recall. I can’t find evidence of that. It is interesting to me people are leaping to that conclusion. Thoughts?

Missed It 3 Times?! GM's 6.2L V8 Engine Recall Field Report Wows

In his coverage of the 6.2 recall Getty's Garage brought up an interesting concern about the move to a higher viscosity oil and collapsable lifters.

His concern was that the lifers are designed to work with 0W-20 and that moving to 0W-40 could exacerbate the issue with failing lifters.

Reply 3 likes

click to expand...

Signup for our weekly newsletter

Sign Up for Our Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletters to get the latest in car news and have editor curated stories sent directly to your inbox.